8 Big fines you want to avoid
Attention Landlords!
Even the most well-meaning landlord can end up in hot water if they aren’t aware of all the ins and outs of the Residential Tenancies Act and how the tenancy system works.
In this article, we’ll look at 8 big fines that landlords should avoid.
8 Big Fines
Travelling Overseas
up to $1,000
Landlords travelling overseas and failing to appoint an agent
Did you know if you’re a landlord and travel overseas for longer than three weeks and don’t appoint
an agent then you could be up for a $1,000 fine?
Tenancy Law says its really important that the tenant has someone they can contact while you are
away, so for this reason if you are going to be out of the country for more than 21 consecutive days
you need to appoint an agent in your place.
Failure Lodging Bond
up to $1,000
Failure to lodge the bond
This is something we see all the time! Landlords failing to lodge the bond in the correct fashion –
check out the story below about a property management company who received a fine of $34,000
for failing to do this!
Lodging the bond in the correct fashion means ensuring you provide a receipt with name, date,
bond amount and what it is for. Then you only have 23 days to ensure you get this paperwork and
the bond to Tenancy Services.
http://bit.ly/bigfineforbond
Seizing Tenant Goods
up to $2,000
Landlords seizing or disposing of tenants goods
Let’s say you’ve had a tenant leave in a hurry and they’ve left some belongings in the house. Be careful
here! There is a proper process around storage and disposal which must be followed. Failure to
do this correctly could result in a fine of up to $2,000. This can happen even if you are still chasing a
tenant for money they owe you!
Privacy of Tenant
up to $1,000
Interfering with the privacy of the tenant
There are different examples of this, however one example was a landlord mowing the tenant’s
lawns themselves and being taken to the tribunal. Even the most well-meaning landlords can get
caught out on this one. Keep this regulation in mind if you are considering doing things yourself,
such as the lawns without a process in place. The tenant has a right to peace, privacy and comfort in
their property, so it’s important to avoid any activities that may interfere with this.
Section 45 Duties
up to $4,000
Failing to meet your duties under section 45 of the Act
This includes your obligations around providing a safe and healthy home to live in. For example the
home has to be clean, maintained and needs to meet building codes. Section 45 also covers things
like working smoke alarms on your property and having the right standard of insulation. As of 1 July
2019 there are additional rules that have come in under the Healthy Homes Standards – including
new insulation requirements.
Unlawful Entry
up to $1,000
Unlawful entry by landlord
As a landlord you cannot enter the rental property unless you give the appropriate notice to the
tenant. Failure to give this notice can be deemed unlawful entry and can result in a fine of up to
$1,000. Even if you have a great relationship with the tenant, be aware that you cannot just enter the
property without giving this notice.
Retaliatory Notice
up to $4,000
Retaliatory notice of termination
An example of this is if you have a tenant breaking the rules and you serve them a notice on this
issue and at the same time, give them 90 day notice to move out – this can be seen as a retaliation
for the initial rule-break. If this went to tribunal (as many have done) then it can be ruled that the
landlord served this notice to vacate in retaliation for something the tenant has done.
An example would be serving the tenant notice to remove dogs from the property, and at the same
time serving them 90 day notice to vacate. The tribunal can see this as retaliation for having dogs
on the property. In this example you could end up with a $4000 fine and the tribunal could also rule
that the tenancy has to stay in place.
Discrimination
up to $4,000
Discrimination during the tenancy process
Of course as a landlord you (or your property manager) have a right to screen tenants. However the
type of tenant you have in mind needs to always be based on real qualities – for instance you may
want someone reliable, who is able to pay rent on time and can provide good references. If on the
other hand you are basing your selection on factors such as age, or employment status, then this is
grounds for discrimination.
This law is in place for a great reason which is to prevent any discrimination against tenants during
the selection process. For example, if you told a tenant that they had missed out on a property for
any of following reasons then that would be grounds for discrimination; sex, martial status, religious
belief, ethical belief, colour, race, ethnic origin, disability, age, political opinion, employment status,
family status or sexual orientation.
newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter and stay up to date!
Profit from our Knowledge
Need Advice?
If you’d like more free advice on any of these breaches, or have any questions then contact us for a free no-obligation chat today. We can help give you the peace of mind to know that you are following the law and have all the correct procedures in place.